MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, easier to write, easier to read.
PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, face to face skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as likely to find employment…..
Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long haul, EG 1/6 students can change their higher education course while at uni….
Lots of people think that it is far better to learn something in a combined group as opposed to individually. Would you agree or disagree?
Agree – learning in group has several advantages
Elements of teamwork can be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise
Paragraph 2– that is disagree is better
Self reliant, own the result, not based upon others
More mature way, more responsible
Topic and Answer: Education (child)
Many people believe that children needs to do organised activities inside their time that is free while genuinely believe that children should be able to do what they need to complete within their leisure time. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your answer.
PARAGRAPH 1 favour that is-In of them choose.
-benefits letting the mind wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do whatever they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent research has revealed 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it could be unfair to this minority.
PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the school
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to buy
-furthermore studies show that the brain operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as studying.
Topic and Answer: Globalisation
Lots of people say that globalisation plus the growing quantity of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the environmental surroundings. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to aid your answer. As to the extent do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your position.
PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS interaction that is-Increased countries
-Increase in goods and services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop associated with the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these can have drastic consequences if accidents happen best college essay writing service
-EG BP Gulf of Mexico, oil spill, destroyed the ecosystem that is local…
Scientists think that to be able to protect environmental surroundings, people must use less energy inside their lives that are daily. However, a lot of people never have changed the way they live. How come you believe many individuals never have taken action that is individual? What might be done to encourage them to do something?
Ideas for body paragraph 1
Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy for the commons
– Collective problem – more straightforward to shirk responsibility
Ideas for body paragraph 2
What could be done to cause them to become take action?
– Media campaigns by the federal government
– Tax or financial incentives EG In Tokyo ……
Some think that is the responsibility of individuals to take care of the environmental surroundings. Others say this is the national government that will take care of the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
People should care for the surroundings because:
we have been the consumers, we vote with your wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)
Government should look after the environmental surroundings because:
they will have the charged power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
said to be guardians for the country, which means collectively these are typically guardians of the earth… not true the truth is
Both should really be doing more!
In many countries small shops and town centers ‘re going out of business, because individuals tend to drive to your large out-of-town stores. This leads to a rise in car use, plus it means that people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores. You think benefits of such development outweigh its disadvantages?